Language and statements follow their own rules, and allow us to do and say certain things, but the relationship between our statements and the world outside them is not rule-governed.
Wittgenstein theme of “language games” can be exploited explicitly in the literature. What we showed is that between the activities called LANGUAGE GAMES there are more relations of functional analogies or conceptual functionality. According to LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN is saying, there were different people with the different verbal communication, but the message is conveying in there comfortable language. There is different verbal communication with different public and these are following there rules and regulation. “There is, in other words, something primordial, something foundational, about thinking visually”.
All messages conveying the meaning, without any rules they saying there meaning. For example if we talked about RAJ THAKAREY, his conveying message is so crucial and idiot (sometime it make sense) the main views he wants to present in front of civic, that is saying is totally right others are worth less. Actually RAJ THAKAREY’s speech is so prejudice, that is the reason Marathi Manus gets easily attracted towards it. And he always opposes bahiyya’s. His speech emphasizes to those public whose go through his ways.
It can be targeted to the audience, were audience get influence from one speech and get more and more influenced in these kinds of issues.






